REVIEW OF CONTEXT AND COMMUNICATION CONTENT IN SECONDARY TRADITIONAL COMMUNITIES SECONDARY VILLAGE

Authors

  • Ardiyansyah Ardiyansyah Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (STISIP NH) Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37638/sengkuni.1.1.37-45

Abstract

The phenomenon of the demands of an increasingly modern and increasingly advanced era makes Remote Indigenous Communities known as the Suku Anak Dalam inevitably have to be involved in various communication contexts. This study aims to determine the form or context of communication that takes place in Remote Indigenous Communities, and see the content or elements of messages in building communication during the social interaction of Suku Anak Dalam in the midst of the life of the majority of Malay people in Saramangun, Sekamis Village, Jambi. This study was analyzed using the concept of the context of communication contexts with the Qualitative Method. describe and analyze the phenomena and social activities of the Anak Dalam Tribe. Data was collected through in-depth interviews in the Anak Dalam community, structured field observations and documentation. The data analysis technique used is that according to Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman (in Sugiyono, 2012: 246) there are three components, namely: Data Reduction, Data Presentation and Verification / Withdrawal of Conclusions. Field findings and analysis results show that the context and content of Communication in Remote Indigenous Communities is using Interpersonal Communication, Group Communication, Organizational Communication. 

References

Aswad Ishak dan Faiz Ayatullah, 2003,“Komunikasi & Organisasi”, Yogyakarta; UPFE UMY

A.W Wijdaya, 1993, “Komunikasi dan Hubungan Masyarakat”, Jakarta, Bumi Aksara.

Andrik Purwasito, 2002, “Komunikasi Multikultural”, Surakarta, Muhammadiyah Universitas Press.

Andrik Purwasito, 2003, “Message Studies: Pesan Penggerak kebudayaan”,Surakarta, Ndalem Poerwahadiningrat Press.

Arni Muhammad, 2009, Komunikasi Organisasi, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

B. Aubrey Fisher, 1978, Teori-teori Komunikasi, Bandung, Remaja Roesda Karya.

Bagong Suyanto & Sutinah (ED.), 2005, “Metode Penelitian Sosial; Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan”, Jakarta: Kencana

Dedy Mulyana, 2001, “Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar”, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Dedy Mulyana dan Jalaluddin Rakhmat, 2006, “Komunikasi Antar Budaya”, Panduan Komunikasi dengan Orang-orang berbeda Budaya, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1989, “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia”, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

P. joyo Subarjo, 1996, “Metode dalam Teori dan Praktek”, Jakarta: Arcan , 1996.

Pawito, 2007, “Penelitian Komunikasi Kualitatif”, Yogyakarta: lKiS Pelangi Aksara.

Rinto Adi, Heru Prasedja, 1991, “Langkah-langkah Penelitian Sosial”, Jakarta: Arcan.

Reed Blake dan Edwin O Haroldsen. 2003, “Taksonomi Konsep komunikasi”,

Surabaya: Papyrus.

Setiawan Jauhari, 2001, “Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Desertasi”, Bandung: Rama Widya.

Sukardi, 2004, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan kompetensi dan praktiknya,

Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

San Abede Pareno, 2002, “Kuliah Komunikasi”, Surabaya: Papyrus. Thomas Hill Long, 1979, Collins English Dictionary, London

W.J.S. Porwadarmita, 1976, “Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia”, Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka

Winarno Surakhmad, 1998, “Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah; Dasar, Metode dan Tekhnik”, Bandung: Tarsito

Published

2020-04-20

Issue

Section

Articles